pepita

In General I felt comfortable doing the Blogs, specially writing about the topic because I can do it in my own times (obviously with a limit, but I can have more liberty for distribute it) and have the space for work alone with the tools that I choose (for example the translator of internet, a tool with I could find more and new words and expand a little my vocabulary) (and see the pronunciation of the words)
I think that my skills for writing have developed a good quantity (not for make a good work) but I felt that I improved and I can say my thinkings in a better way, more specific.
In my opinion, in the future I would like to include more awards in candies or other things like that (food)(is a good way of behaviorism for me) like in other activities or writing about topics were we can explain about things that we know how to do.
And finally, in the next semester (if I pass the III level) I would like to talk about music again (always is a pleasure talk and read about music for me) maybe our opinions about topics like sexuality and genre, religion, society and more.

maqui

I really love a lot of different music and I don`t have a favourite genre of music, but how I must to answer about that I think I can talk about a "genre" that I enjoy too much: Latin american fusion.
This a a type of music that I like a lot because I feel it is a very interesting way to deepen in the originatives rhythms of the countries with amazing geographies and cultures how is it Latin america and a too a manner of play, zoom in and enlarge those cultures and the all musical spectrum.
In Chile this way to make music "born" in the second half of twentieth century and it is derived from folkloric rhythms of each countries of Latin America and mergers with jazz, blues, learned music and others.
Because it is a very heterophasic and varied way to make music we can find a great variety of instruments in it and its depend of how specific is the rhythm that it rescues.
The more important exponents in Chile are Inti illimani and Entrama (for me) an in the "new" music we can find a very good exponents like Elizabeth Morris, Juan Antonio(Chicoria) Sanchez, other icons are Eduardo Mateo and Hugo Fattoruso and some works of Gustavo Pena from Uruguay, the "Aca seca" group and the works of Carlos Aguirre and Eduardo Falú in Argentina and a great gamma of others.

piña

The best subject that I studied this semester was artistic Engraved and I had classes 3 times in the week: monday, wednesday and friday and I did liked because I never did that before and I discovered many new things that I did not expect would like to me (so that it displace me from my principal work -or that I used think was my specialty- the painting ) giving to me an all new place with many tools for investigation. And that was/is the best part and the part that I enjoy more: the amount of possibilities of work that you have in Engraved, the amplitude and the enormity of solution for understand and deepen.
The teacher too influence to me because he is knowledgeable and generous with the knowledge in adittion to being very responsible, and the other big big reason it is because I admire much his work, he is genial! so I try to do best my work.
In this semester,specifically, I learned about Lithography(and the different optionssssss that you have to do it) and a little about Drypoint.

laurava

To start I can say some advantages of my career, maybe several distant of a conventional(very productive, practice) mind.

I want to say that my career is only a place where I can gather with other people of the area and have the dialogues and tools for work, one of many, but because I know since more than 2 years I can say it is not a very bad place because you can find some interesting teacher and persons due to the variety, own of this area. For that reason is too a place where you have to have a wide capacity of view and keep developing ( is the same thing with the work, you never stop to learn new things or "solutions")

Other good, maybe the best point, is the time (when you move to other years of the career, more high) that you have and the independence (because you have to work in your "own work").

The disadvantages are many too, but I only speak about things like the income and administration of the money for mantencion and equipment of the workshops. (the way that it is funded).

About the esteem I can see that in this country my career is not well know and you can see in the reforms of education ( decrease in hours of arts for the students in the school) in the financing of places and projects and the opinion of people about the importance for do, understand and study arts. Much disinformation.

For study that the universities ask of you point of the PSU or/and money but in other instances that I believe really and fundamentally you need to see many many images, touch, used you senses and reflection, put you in the "images", really see and do since the images and the things, reflect with you work and of the others (study study study, see see see)("history of arts") and try to keeping see, work and learn. Eer much and be in the process (too seeing) not loose the attention.

The personal benefits that I got studing art summarizes in going getting a place for dialogue with the life (my, of the other, of the matter) in a best way that only think with only thinkings. Or best, think more with the image or later the image.

In theory I can work in cultural centers, in my workshop, museum, etc. And I hope make money for pay a home with the principal things and can travel but I think it depend of as I move (buy things, giving class bla bla bla) so I don' know ass I i´ll win.

mono

I really don't know deeply about philosophy, I read a lot of biographies and articles of characters and their ideas in a general way, but I didn't study many texts (or all of the texts) of one so I cant write with too much security. Understood this I will tell you about the author of the last book (independent of university) that I read and loved, and his name is Gastón Bachelard and the book is called "The poetry of the space"
This author is a philosopher, physicist, poet, teacher and critic of France and their principal ideas turn around the overcoming of the debate between empiricism and rationalism(or that says wikipedia). But how I know just an book and considering that this author do various studies I just talk about of the poetry of the space that is a analysis or assortative system of the poetic images of the life, books, painting, drawing, music, etc and is in this images where the author is based or "inspired" for unrolling/ collet the imaginative substance.
About this topics of "aesthetic criticism" the other famous books are "The water and the dreams", "The poetic of reverie" , The air and the dreams" and etc.
I like more than the ideas of he , the way with he connected with many corners of the little images and the way that its arising to you and dwell the things and the imagination.
For hat reasons I think I can "link" or  conversely , his images are linked with my life because when I read I understood we inhabit and travel in the same or closer levels of reverie with the objets and the imagination or in other words, of the depth of matters and its phenomena, walk seeing "similar" things.